Implicit learning: Indirect, not unconscious

33Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Dienes and Berry (1997) argue that there really are two kinds of knowledge, implicit and explicit, that can be characterized through a subjective threshold. We argue that the subjective threshold does not separate two forms of knowledge, but instead two uses of knowledge, for two different purposes. With Neal and Hesketh (1997), we suggest that an understanding of learning will be better served by investigating the processing that occurs under various circumstances than by attempting to isolate learning that occurs with awareness from that which occurs without it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Dorken, M. D. (1997). Implicit learning: Indirect, not unconscious. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210775

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free