5-year longitudinal study of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in acute anterior uveitis

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Acute anterior uveitis (AAU) is a frequently encountered form of uveitis, most commonly an immune-mediated condition associated with the HLA-B27 gene with or without spondyloarthritis, or idiopathic in nature. This study’s aim was to measure clinical and patient-reported outcomes 5 years after the first episode of immune-mediated AAU. Methods: This is a longitudinal observational study. Ninety-six patients who underwent evaluation at the time of presentation with their first episode of AAU were invited to return for evaluation 5 years later. Standardised ocular history, clinical examination and quality of life (QOL) assessment with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Vision Core Measure 1 (VCM 1) questionnaire were completed and analysed. Results: Fifty-four patients (56%) returned for subsequent assessment. Physical function was the only sub scale domain of the SF-36 that had significantly deteriorated over the 5 years since the first episode of AAU (45.95 vs. 49.37, p = 0.003). Only 7.4% (n = 4) of patients expressed “more than a little concern” regarding their vision, reflected by a VCM1 score of 2.0 or more. At 5 years, the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of eyes affected by AAU was LogMAR 0.02 and only 3% (n = 2) of eyes had a BCVA of less than Logmar of 0.3. Five affected eyes (8%) had developed cataract and no patients had developed glaucoma by the 5 year review. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that immune-mediated AAU has an excellent 5 year prognosis with minimal impact on patients’ health and vision-related quality of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goodchild, C., O’Rourke, M., Haroon, M., FitzGerald, O., & Murphy, C. C. (2021). 5-year longitudinal study of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in acute anterior uveitis. Eye (Basingstoke), 35(2), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0937-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free