Successful aging

0Citations
Citations of this article
219Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Until now, prospective studies of aging have begun with SG-60-year-olds. not adolescents. Premature death, child hood variables, and alcohol abuse have been often ignored, as has successful aging. Method: The authors reviewed the existing literature on health in late life in order to highlight that, increasingly, successful aging is not an oxymoron. The present study followed two cohorts of adolescent boys (237 college students and 332 corecity youth) for 60 years or until death. Complete physical examinations were obtained every 5 years and psychosocial data every 2 years. Predictor variables assessed before age 50 included six variables reflecting uncontrollable factors: parental social class, family cohesion, major depression, ancestral longevity, childhood temperament, and physical health at age so and seven variables reflecting (at least some) personal control: alcohol abuse, smoking, marital stability, exercise, body mass index, coping mechanisms, and edu cation. The six outcome variables chosen to assess successful aging at age 7o-80 in eluded four objectively assessed variables (physical health, death and disability be fore age 80, social supports, and mental health) and two self-rated variables (instrumental activities of daily living and life enjoyment). Results: Multivariate analysis suggested that “good�? and “bad�? aging from age 70- 80 could be predicted by variables assessed before age 50. More hopeful still, if the seven variables under some personal control were controlled, depression was the only uncontrollable predictor variable that affected the quality of subjective and objective aging. Conclusions: One may have greater per sonal control over one’s biopsychosocial health after retirement than previously recognized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vaillant, G. E., & Mukamal, K. (2013). Successful aging. In The Science of Mental Health: Stress and the Brain (Vol. 9, pp. 205–214). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20110208-01

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free