Positive-end expiratory pressure reduces incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in nonhypoxemic patients

151Citations
Citations of this article
181Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect on clinical outcomes of prophylactic positive end expiratory pressure in nonhypoxemic ventilated patients. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: One trauma and two general intensive care units in two university hospitals. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-one mechanically ventilated patients with normal chest radiograph and Pao2/Fio2 above 250. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation with 5-8 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (PEEP group, n ≤ 66) or no-PEEP (control group, n ≤ 65). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary end-point variable was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included microbiologically confirmed ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, barotrauma, atelectasis, and hypoxemia (Pao2/Fio2 <175). Both groups were similar at randomization in demographic characteristics, intensive care unit admission diagnoses, severity of illness, and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Hospital mortality rate was similar (p ≤ 0.58) between PEEP (29.7%) and control (25.4%) groups. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was detected in 16 (25.4%) patients in the control group and 6 (9.4%) in the PEEP group (relative risk, 0.37; 95% confidence interval ≤ 0.15-0.84; p ≤ 0.017). The number of patients who developed hypoxemia was significantly higher in the control group (34 of 63 patients, 54%) than in the PEEP group (12 of 64, 19%) (p < 0.001), and the hypoxemia developed after a shorter period (median [interquartile range]) in the control group than in the PEEP group (38 [20-70] hrs vs. 77 [32-164] hrs, p < 0.001). Groups did not significantly differ in incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (14% in controls vs. 5% in the PEEP group, p ≤ 0.08), barotrauma (8% vs. 2%, respectively, p ≤ 0.12), or atelectasis (27% vs. 19%, respectively, p ≤ 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that application of prophylactic PEEP in nonhypoxemic ventilated patients reduces the number of hypoxemia episodes and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. © 2008 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manzano, F., Fernández-Mondéjar, E., Colmenero, M., Poyatos, M. E., Rivera, R., MacHado, J., … Artigas, A. (2008). Positive-end expiratory pressure reduces incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in nonhypoxemic patients. Critical Care Medicine, 36(8), 2225–2231. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817b8a92

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free