Implementation and performance of trackers for the detection of surgical adverse events

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to identify the frequency and performance of the Canadian Adverse Events Study tracking criteria for the confirmation of surgical adverse events in adult patients. Method: a descriptive and retrospective study conducted in a public hospital in the state of Paraná from May to November 2017. A retrospective review of 192 medical records was conducted using 16 tracking criteria; and the confirmation of adverse events was in charge of a committee of experts composed of a physician and nurses. Data was analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Results: the mean performance of the trackers was 73.3%. A total of 70 trackers were confirmed in 21.8% of the medical records with adverse events. The mean number of trackers was 0.4 per medical record (varying from zero to three). Adverse reaction to the medication; unplanned return to the operating room; unplanned removal, injury or correction of an organ or structure during surgery or invasive procedure; cardiopulmonary arrest reversed and hospital infection/sepsis were classified as high performance trackers (100.0%). Eight trackers did not contribute to the identification of adverse events. Conclusion: high-performance trackers can assist in detecting adverse events; there is potential to improve the tracking tool, contributing to its performance as a research method in Brazilian hospitals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Batista, J., Da Silva, D. P., & Cruz, E. D. D. A. (2020). Implementation and performance of trackers for the detection of surgical adverse events. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 29, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2019-0163

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free