Interesses e valores na política externa de Obama: Leading from behind?

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This study will exam the relative importance of values and interests in Obama’s foreign policy, focusing on crucial cases: the military actions related to Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Non-Syria, Al-Qaeda and ISIL. We will argue that his “leading from behind” strategy is not very distant from the foreign and defense strategies of his post-Cold War predecessors, by which democracy is seen as an assurance to security. According to Obama’s strategy, Americans will only provide support for the building of democracy in the target countries, while this task should be performed by the locals themselves. Americans will provide military training to the new governments as well so they can be responsible for their own security, including preventing regrouping of terrorists in their soil. If Obama opposes the imposing of democracy by the use of force, empirical data shows that his administration is “not prepared to accept” any option that threats US security or American liberal-democratic values, bringing in this way values and interests very close to each other.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Castro Santos, M. H., & Teixeira, U. T. (2015). Interesses e valores na política externa de Obama: Leading from behind? Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 58(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free