Educational meta-evaluation: Comparative diagnosis of the quality of the Administration course in face-to-face and distance education modalities

Abstract

The study makes a comparison between the quality of on-site and distance education for Administration courses evaluated in Enade 2018. The meta-evaluation is based on the analysis of the Enade Concept indicator, at three levels: Standardized Notes - FG and CE and Enade Concept - continuous. Through the Minitab 19 software, statistical analyzes are performed. The results show a very strong relationship between the Standardized Score - CE and Enade Concept - continuous. There is a predominance of better student performance results, in the face-to-face modality, in the South and Southeast regions, and the worst results, in the North and Central-West regions. The Tukey test by ANOVA allowed us to conclude that the performance of students from public institutions, in the on site, is higher than that of in the distance education. The study brought contributions that add value to the decision-making of stakeholders, from the definition of an overview of the quality of management courses, evidencing strengths, weaknesses, merit and value.