Quo vadis, hydrology?

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This is an invited essay by the Dooge Medallist of the 2017 International Hydrological Prize. The paper reflects a broad perspective on hydrology, as a result of the author’s long experience. It is suggested that transgressing the traditional hydrological perspective, by increasing the scale of research, as well as interdisciplinarization have been, and are likely to remain, key drivers of the development of hydrology. Gaps in knowledge and research challenges are reviewed, and the interlinked areas of stationarity, extremes and projections for the future are discussed. Finally, after reviewing the achievements of Jim Dooge, examples of others following in his footsteps are presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2018). Quo vadis, hydrology? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(8), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1489597

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free