Visita proibida/visita não proibida numa unidade de paciente crítico adulto

0Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To search for evidence to answer the question: How do unrestricted visits affect patients, their families and healthcare professionals, as opposed to restricted visits? Method: Systemic review. Search strategy: 1993-2016 in Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs, EBSCO, PubMed, CINHAL, Trip DataBase, with Mesh terms and key words. Criteria for selecting articles: systematic reviews, randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, cohort studies, control studies, descriptive correlational studies, ICU adults, Spanish and English. Collection and analysis: initial selection of 293 articles and a final selection of 13 articles for critical analysis after applying the selection criteria. The researchers used the CASPe guidelines to assess methodological quality. Results: Unrestricted visits do not increase risk of infection, patient’s anxiety is lower, nurses are more satisfied, family presence helps in patient recovery, families are better informed, more satisfied and have a better understanding of the situation. The frequency of cardiovascular complications is higher in patients with restricted visits. Conclusions: Unrestricted visits to the ICU do not harm the patient but instead contribute to their physical and emotional health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anativia Montenegro, P., Farias-Reyes, D., Galiano-Gálvez, M. A., & Quiroga-Toledo, N. (2016). Visita proibida/visita não proibida numa unidade de paciente crítico adulto. Aquichan, 16(3), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2016.16.3.6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free