Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis

111Citations
Citations of this article
177Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The studies reported here used an interference paradigm to determine whether a long-term consolidation process (i.e., one lasting from several hours to days) occurs in the learning of two implicit motor skills, learning of a movement sequence and learning of a visuo-motor mapping. Subjects learned one skill and were tested on that skill 48 h later. Between the learning session and test session, some subjects trained on a second skill. The amount of time between the learning of the two skills varied for different subjects. In both the learning of a movement sequence and the learning of a visuo-motor mapping, we found that remote memories were susceptible to interference, but the passage of time did not afford protection from interference. These results are inconsistent with the long-term consolidation of these motor skills. A possible difference between these tasks and those that do show long-term consolidation is that the present tasks are not dynamic motor skills.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goedert, K. M., & Willingham, D. B. (2002). Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. Learning and Memory, 9(5), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.50102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free