Abstract
The studies reported here used an interference paradigm to determine whether a long-term consolidation process (i.e., one lasting from several hours to days) occurs in the learning of two implicit motor skills, learning of a movement sequence and learning of a visuo-motor mapping. Subjects learned one skill and were tested on that skill 48 h later. Between the learning session and test session, some subjects trained on a second skill. The amount of time between the learning of the two skills varied for different subjects. In both the learning of a movement sequence and the learning of a visuo-motor mapping, we found that remote memories were susceptible to interference, but the passage of time did not afford protection from interference. These results are inconsistent with the long-term consolidation of these motor skills. A possible difference between these tasks and those that do show long-term consolidation is that the present tasks are not dynamic motor skills.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Goedert, K. M., & Willingham, D. B. (2002). Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. Learning and Memory, 9(5), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.50102
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.