Estidama and the pearl rating system: A comprehensive review and alignment with LCA

14Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Multiple sustainability standards and rating systems have been developed to draw attention to constructing sustainable buildings. The Pearl Rating System (PRS) is a mandate for all new construction projects in Abu Dhabi. Hence, it is important to understand the main components, advantages, and limitations of the PRS. The feasibility and the practical relevance of the PRS are still being studied. This paper addresses this gap and critically evaluates the PRS against some of the well-established rating systems like LEED and BREEAM. The analysis suggests that the PRS considers the cultural aspect of sustainability, in addition to the environmental, societal, and economic aspects. It was also found that most rating systems, including the PRS, have a very superficial inclusion of life cycle assessment (LCA). The paper finally concludes with other observations and outlook for a more robust implementation of the PRS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramani, A., & García De Soto, B. (2021). Estidama and the pearl rating system: A comprehensive review and alignment with LCA. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free