Landmarks, critical paths and abstractions: What's the difference anyway?

396Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Current heuristic estimators for classical domain-independent planning are usually based on one of four ideas: delete relaxations, critical paths, abstractions, and, most recently, landmarks. Previously, these different ideas for deriving heuristic functions were largely unconnected. We prove that admissible heuristics based on these ideas are in fact very closely related. Exploiting this relationship, we introduce a new admissible heuristic called the landmark cut heuristic, which compares favourably with the state of the art in terms of heuristic accuracy and overall performance. Copyright © 2009, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helmert, M., & Domshlak, C. (2009). Landmarks, critical paths and abstractions: What’s the difference anyway? In ICAPS 2009 - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (pp. 162–169). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v19i1.13370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free