Indicators of the risk mechanics for Class-I and Class-II amalgam and composite resin restorations

  • Fernández E
  • Arroyo E
  • Pardo C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To determine indicators of prognosis for mechanical risks of amalgam and composite resin restorations in permanent teeth. METHODS: Thirty-nine adult patients with direct clinical, photographic, radiographic and model examinations. A total of 256 restorations were classified as "not satisfactory," with Bravo or Charlie values according to the modified Ryge /USPHS criteria. The total "n" was divided into Bravo and Charlie groups according to the value obtained in the "marginal adaptation" parameter. Each of the groups was sub-divided by the type of material (amalgam and composite resins) and the class: occlusal (O) and proximal (MOD). RESULTS : Comparing the Bravo and Charlie groups, the statistically significant indicators were: the mesiodistal dimension (p=0.037), the distal isthmus (p{

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández, E., Arroyo, E. D., Pardo, C. L., Oliveira Junior, O. B., Cortés, G. M., & Casielles, J. M. (2014). Indicators of the risk mechanics for Class-I and Class-II amalgam and composite resin restorations. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, 13(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v13n2a13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free