Significance of absent ankle pulse

26Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The great observer error in the detection of the posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis pulses is demonstrated. In the limbs of subjects under the age of 20, on the average a single observer failed to detect 0.24% of posterior tibial pulses and 8.7% of dorsalis pedis pulses. In patients not presenting primarily with atherosclerosis the lack of significance of inability to detect the dorsalis pedis pulse is shown. Evidence is produced that if three independent observers are unable to detect the posterior tibial pulse there is a high degree of probability that an abnormality is present. © 1962, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ludbrook, J., Clarke, A. M., & McKenzie, J. K. (1962). Significance of absent ankle pulse. British Medical Journal, 1(5294), 1724–1726. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5294.1724

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free