Developing calibration weights and standard-error estimates for a survey of drug-related emergency-department visits

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article describes a two-step calibration-weighting scheme for a stratified simple random sample of hospital emergency departments. The first step adjusts for unit nonresponse. The second increases the statistical efficiency of most estimators of interest. Both use a measure of emergency-department size and other useful auxiliary variables contained in the sampling frame. Although many survey variables are roughly a linear function of the measure of size, response is better modeled as a function of the log of that measure. Consequently the log of size is a calibration variable in the nonresponse-adjustment step, while the measure of size itself is a calibration variable in the second calibration step. Nonlinear calibration procedures are employed in both steps. We show with 2010 DAWN data that estimating variances as if a one-step calibration weighting routine had been used when there were in fact two steps can, after appropriately adjusting the finite-population correct in some sense, produce standard-error estimates that tend to be slightly conservative. © Statistics Sweden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kott, P. S., & Day, C. D. (2014). Developing calibration weights and standard-error estimates for a survey of drug-related emergency-department visits. Journal of Official Statistics, 30(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.2478/JOS-2014-0032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free