Welfare Analysis: Bridging the Partial and General Equilibrium Divide for Policy Analysis

18Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Advances in theoretical and computable general equilibrium modeling brought their conceptual foundations more in line with standard microeconomic constructs. This reduced the theoretical gap between welfare measurements using a partial or a general equilibrium approach. However, the separation of the partial and general equilibrium literatures lingers in many applications that this manuscript seeks to bridge. The now shared conceptual foundations, the importance of functional specification, the role of common price movements and closure rules are discussed. The continuing stricture in U.S. Government guidelines against including secondary effects in welfare measures is questioned.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farrow, S., & Rose, A. (2018). Welfare Analysis: Bridging the Partial and General Equilibrium Divide for Policy Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 9(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2017.29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free