The Changing Nature of Scientific Sharing and Withholding in Academic Life Sciences Research: Trends from National Surveys in 2000 and 2013

16Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose Since 2000, federal funders and many journals have established policies requiring more open sharing of data and materials post-publication, primarily through online supplements and third-party repositories. This study examined changes in sharing and withholding practices among academic life scientists, particularly geneticists, between 2000 and 2013. Method In 2000 and 2013, the authors surveyed separate samples of 3,000 academic life scientists at the 100 U.S. universities receiving the most National Institutes of Health funding. Respondents were asked to estimate the number of requests for information, data, and materials they made to and received from other academic researchers in the past three years. They were also asked about potential consequences of sharing and withholding. Results Response rates were 63.9% (1,849/2,893) in 2000 and 40.8% (1,165/2,853) in 2013. Proportions of faculty in 2000 and 2013 who received, denied, made, or were denied at least one request were not statistically different. However, the total volume of requests received from or made to other scientists dropped substantially (19.4 received in 2000 versus 10.8 in 2013, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zinner, D. E., Pham-Kanter, G., & Campbell, E. G. (2016, March 1). The Changing Nature of Scientific Sharing and Withholding in Academic Life Sciences Research: Trends from National Surveys in 2000 and 2013. Academic Medicine. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free