Myocardial protection: Efficacy of a novel magnesium-based cardioplegia (RS-C) compared to St Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution

16Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cardiac surgery patients now tend to be sicker with more severe disease; consequently, improved protection is important. We compared St Thomas' Hospital solution (STH2: hyperkalaemia and hypermagnesaemia) to a hypermagnesaemia-alone cardioplegia (RS-C) based on a novel non-phosphate buffered crystalloid solution (Aqix® RS-I). Isolated Langendorff-perfused rat hearts were used (function measured). Initial studies established optimal magnesium concentration as 25 mmol/l (LVDP recovery after 50 min at 37 8C global ischaemia (GI) for 16, 25, 35, 50 mmol/l magnesium vs. STH2 was 48±3, 50±2, 50±3, 30±3 and 51±2%, respectively). Contracture-related measurements (onset time, peak) for 25 mmol/l RS-C (32±1 min, 35±1 mmHg) compared favourable (P<0.05) to STH2 (26±1 min, 43±2 mmHg). LVDP recovery after a single 2-min cardioplegic infusion (with RS-C-25 or STH2) and 20, 30, 40 or 50 min GI was higher for RS-C-25 than STH2 after 20 min GI (81±1% vs. 74±1%; [P<0.05]) but similar at other GI durations. Subsequent multi-infusion studies (60 min GI, 3x2 min infusions every 20 min) demonstrated significantly improved recovery with RS-C-25 vs. STH2 (LVDP: 73±2%, 44±1% [P<0.001]; LVEDP: 9±2 mmHg, 45±2 mmHg [P<0.001]). We conclude that single RS-C infusion with optimal 25 mmol/l magnesium improved protection after short (20 min) GI durations, or after multi-infusions during prolonged (60 min) GI durations. Magnesium-based cardioplegia may be a useful alternative to hyperkalaemic cardioplegia under certain specific conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maruyama, Y., & Chambers, D. J. (2008). Myocardial protection: Efficacy of a novel magnesium-based cardioplegia (RS-C) compared to St Thomas’ Hospital cardioplegic solution. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 7(5), 745–749. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.181057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free