Comparative Analysis of the Quality Perception in Public Spaces of Duzce City

  • Karacor E
  • Akcam E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Public spaces in urban areas were affected from neoliberal policies in terms of their management and ownership. Accordingly, several researchers handled public spaces from different perspectives considering on advantages or disadvantages of neoliberal policies. Four key attributes of successful places: accessibility, comfort, socialization, and activity are accepted as quality indicators of today's urban spaces and they became an outline for this study. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of different type public spaces and to determine the reason why these differences. Therefore , quality differences resulting from management and ownership were evaluated in scope of public space literature. Our findings put forward that ownership of spaces is not a significant factor perceiving the quality of spaces. Besides, publicly owned urban spaces were found as not always preferable and the ownership was not a basis factor for quality perception.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karacor, E. K., & Akcam, E. (2016). Comparative Analysis of the Quality Perception in Public Spaces of Duzce City. Current Urban Studies, 04(03), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2016.43017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free