Compact food bar improves cardiopulmonary function in men military athletes: A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind clinical trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of compact food bar (CFB) designed on cardiopulmonary function in men athletes who serve in military service. Materials and Methods: In this randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial, 46 men of military staff were arranged into 2 groups and studied for 28 days; one branch used 3 packs daily, 700 kcal each, of CFB with Functional compounds (Caffeine and L-arginine) and the other group used regular food during training course. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 Max) in vitro with cardiopulmonary exercise test, body composition, and physical activity were assessed and recorded at baseline and end of the study period. Results: VO 2 Max (P = 0.05) significantly increased in CFB group compared with baseline. Moreover, VO 2 Max (P = 0.01), VO 2 /HR (P = 0.04), oxygen uptake/heart rate (VO 2 /HR) (P = 0.03), and ventilation per minute/oxygen uptake (VE/VO 2) (P = 0.03) significantly increased in CFB group compared with control group. In comparison, there was no significant difference in mean ventilation per minute/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO 2) (P = 0.41), ventilation per minute (VE) (P = 0.69), and breathing frequency (P = 0.056). No significant effect of CFB was found on weight, body mass index (P = 0.23), lean body mass (P = 0.91), and body fat mass (P = 0.91). Conclusion: Our results show that intervention with CFB is more effective than regular diet in improving cardiopulmonary function in men athletes who serve in military service.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadi, S., Amani, R., Tehrani, M. M., Hadi, V., Hejri, S., Mirghazanfari, S. M., & Askari, G. (2022). Compact food bar improves cardiopulmonary function in men military athletes: A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind clinical trial. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 27(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_613_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free