Abstract
This paper presents arguments against two crucial elements of recent versions of the Two-Worlds interpretation of Plato. I argue first that in addition to knowledge of the forms, Plato allows beliefs about them as well. Then I argue that Plato sees knowledge as a state in which the subject is conscious of information about the forms. Thus, the infallibility of knowledge must be understood in a way that is consistent with its being informational. Finally, I argue that my conclusions about knowledge do not preclude the possibility that cognition of forms has a direct, nonrepresentational aspect.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Butler, T. (2007). On today’s two-worlds interpretation: Knowledge and true belief in Plato. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 45(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00041.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.