On today's two-worlds interpretation: Knowledge and true belief in Plato

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents arguments against two crucial elements of recent versions of the Two-Worlds interpretation of Plato. I argue first that in addition to knowledge of the forms, Plato allows beliefs about them as well. Then I argue that Plato sees knowledge as a state in which the subject is conscious of information about the forms. Thus, the infallibility of knowledge must be understood in a way that is consistent with its being informational. Finally, I argue that my conclusions about knowledge do not preclude the possibility that cognition of forms has a direct, nonrepresentational aspect.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butler, T. (2007). On today’s two-worlds interpretation: Knowledge and true belief in Plato. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 45(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00041.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free