In this article, we investigate the emergence of ʺparticipatory journalismʺ as a scholarly object in the field of journalism studies. By conducting a genealogical analysis of 119 articles on participatory journalism, published between 1995 and September 2011, we analyze the development of scholarly ways of writing and thinking about participatory journalism over the years. Our genealogy reveals how the field of journalism studies constructs participatory journalism along the lines of four normative dimensions: ʺenthusiasm about new democratic opportunitiesʺ, ʺdisappointment with professional journalism’s obduracyʺ, ʺdisappointment with economic motives to facilitate participatory journalismʺ, and ʺdisappointment with news users’ passivityʺ. We argue these dimensions are inextricably linked with what ʺcountsʺ as journalism within journalism studies.
CITATION STYLE
Borger, M., van Hoof, A., Meijer, I. C., & Sanders, J. (2013). Constructing participatory journalism as a scholarly object: A genealogical analysis. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.740267
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.