Comparison of serological tests for the detection of ovine and caprine antibody to Brucella melitensis

35Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IELISA), the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CELISA) and the fluorescence polarisation assay (FPA) were evaluated with sera from sheep experimentally infected with Brucella melitensis and negative Canadian sheep. The sensitivity and specificity of the assays were as follows: IELISA: 91.7% and 97.6%, CELISA: 75.0% and 99.8% and FPA: 91.7% and 89.5%. Sera from the same experimental population were divided according to serological reaction in the rose bengal agglutination test (RBT) and the complement fixation test (CFT). Reactivity relative to the RBT positive and CFT positive sera were as follows: IELISA: 99.7%, CELISA: 93.2% and FPA: 99.1%. Since sera from goats with proven B. melitensis infection were not available, 699 sera from goats judged positive in the buffered antigen plate agglutination test (BPAT) and CFT and 982 BPAT/CFT negative Canadian goats were used. The sensitivity and specificity of the assays relative to the BPAT and CFT positive sera were: IELISA: 99.4% and 98.0%, CELISA: 95.4% and 97.1% and FPA: 92.7% and 99.8%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nielsen, K., Gall, D., Smith, P., Balsevicius, S., Garrido, F., Durán Ferrer, M., … Corral, A. (2004). Comparison of serological tests for the detection of ovine and caprine antibody to Brucella melitensis. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, 23(3), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.23.3.1532

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free