The relationship between receptor occlusion and the frequency sweep electromyogram during competitive neuromuscular blockade

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to correlate the frequency sweep electromyogram (FS-EMG) responses to various levels of receptor occlusion during partial neuromuscular blockade by d-tubocurarine (dTc). The FS-EMG represents the integrated compound muscle action potential induced by intra-muscular electrical stimulation as the stimulus frequency increases exponentially from 1 to 100 Hz. The FS-EMG response was recorded from the tibialis anterior muscles of six adult cats at different levels of neuromuscular blockade during recovery from intravenously injected dTc, 0.25 mg/kg. The fraction of receptors blocked was estimated by measuring the depolarization produced by proximate intraarterial injection of graded doses of succinylcholine. The FS-EMG became diminished for driving frequencies greater than 50 Hz when receptor occupancy was about 25-30 per cent. The responses corresponding to lower stimulus rates declined only at increasing levels of occlusion. The FS-EMG response to low-frequency stimulation did not diminish until 70 per cent of the available receptor pool was blocked. Simultaneous measurement of muscle force demonstrated a depressed response equivalent to that of the FS-EMG. These data were compared with the sensitivities reported for other tests of neuromuscular block. The frequency sweep electromyogram appears to be about as sensitive as determination of responses to sustained 5-second tetanic stimulation at 200 Hz, but more sensitive than determination of responses to tetanic stimulation at 100 Hz or twitch responses, or train-of-four measurements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yodlowski, E. H., & Mortimer, J. T. (1981). The relationship between receptor occlusion and the frequency sweep electromyogram during competitive neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology, 54(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198101000-00005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free