Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two multidisciplinary fibromyalgia programs with different intensities. Materials and methods: In this retrospective real-world comparison of patient data, pre-and post-program datasets of Short Form 36 (SF36) and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) were obtained from a total of 210 female patients in two fibromyalgia multidisciplinary day hospital programs including one intensive program with daily treatments summing up to 20 treatment days during four weeks (P20, n=70) versus a less intensive program with 12 treatment days during four weeks (P12, n=140). Results: Multiple subscales of SF36 and FIQ were improved in the pre-post comparison in both groups. In the comparison between the two groups, a statistically significantly higher improvement was found in the P20 group compared to the P12 group for the FIQ subscales of stiffness (p=0.001) and the number of days during which the patient felt “good” (p=0.007). Conclusion: An intensive program of daily treatments and activity seems to be more effective in reducing fibromyalgia-associated stiffness and improving the number of days during which patients feel good than a less intensive program.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kramer, S., Deuschle, L., Kohls, N., Offenbächer, M., & Winkelmann, A. (2020). The importance of daily activity for reducing fibromyalgia symptoms: A retrospective “real world” data comparison of two multimodal treatment programs. Archives of Rheumatology, 35(4), 575–583. https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.7739
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.