COMPARISON OF ROBUST ESTIMATION ON MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODEL

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the robustness of the OLS method with a robust regression model on data that had outliers. The methods used on the robust regression model were M-estimation, MM-estimation, and S-estimation. The step taken was to check the characteristics of the data against outliers. Furthermore, the data were modeled with and without outliers using the OLS method and the M-, MM-, and S-estimations. The results were very different between the data with and without the outlier models in the OLS method. It was reflected in the intercept and standard error variables generated from the models. Meanwhile, the regression model with the M-, MM-, and S-estimations was quite stable and able to withstand the presence of outliers. Based on the three estimations that were robust against the outliers, the MM-estimation was the best candidate because, in addition to having a stable intercept parameter estimation, it also had the smallest standard error, which was 61.9 in the resulting model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jana, P., Rosadi, D., & Supandi, E. D. (2023). COMPARISON OF ROBUST ESTIMATION ON MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODEL. Barekeng, 17(2), 979–988. https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol17iss2pp0979-0988

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free