Intra-fractional patient setup error during fractionated intracranial stereotactic irradiation treatment of patients wearing medical masks: Comparison with and without bite block during COVID-19 pandemic

8Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The immobilization of patients with a bite block (BB) carries the risk of interpersonal infection, particularly in the context of pandemics such as COVID-19. Here, we compared the intra-fractional patient setup error (intra-SE) with and without a BB during fractionated intracranial stereotactic irradiation (STI). Fifteen patients with brain metastases were immobilized using a BB without a medical mask, while 15 patients were immobilized without using a BB and with a medical mask. The intra-SEs in six directions (anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), left-right (LR), pitch, roll, and yaw) were calculated by using cone-beam computed tomography images acquired before and after the treatments. We analyzed a total of 53 and 67 treatment sessions for the with- and without-BB groups, respectively. A comparable absolute mean translational and rotational intra-SE was observed (P > 0.05) in the AP (0.19 vs 0.23 mm with- and without-BB, respectively), SI (0.30 vs 0.29 mm), LR (0.20 vs 0.29 mm), pitch (0.18 vs 0.27°), roll (0.23 vs 0.23°) and yaw (0.27 vs 22°) directions. The resultant planning target volume (PTV) margin to compensate for intra-SE was <1 mm. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the intra-SE and treatment times. A PTV margin of <1 mm was achieved even when patients were immobilized without a BB during STI dose delivery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohira, S., Kanayama, N., Komiyama, R., Ikawa, T., Toratani, M., Ueda, Y., … Teshima, T. (2021). Intra-fractional patient setup error during fractionated intracranial stereotactic irradiation treatment of patients wearing medical masks: Comparison with and without bite block during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Radiation Research, 62(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free