Abstract
Study design: To compare results obtained with a variety of locomotor rating scales in Th9/10 spinal cord transected (Tx) mice. Objectives: To assess spontaneous recovery with a variety of rating scales to find the most sensitive methods for assessing recovery levels in Tx mice and differences associated with gender and condition. Setting: Laval University Medical Center, Neuroscience Unit & Laval University, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Methods: Scales including the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB), the Basso Mouse Score (BMS), the Antri, Orsal and Barthe (AOB), the Motor Function Score (MFS) and the Averaged Combined Score (ACOS) were used to assess, in open-field and treadmill conditions, spontaneous locomotor recovery in male and female Tx mice. Results: The ACOS scale revealed a progressive increase of spontaneous recovery during 5-weeks post-Tx. The other methods detected a progressive increase for the first 2-3 weeks post-Tx without any significant progress in weeks 4 and 5. Generally, scores obtained with each method were nonsignificantly different between males and females or between open-field and treadmill conditions. Conclusion: These results further confirm the existence of a limited but significant increase of locomotor function recovery, occurring without intervention, in Tx animals. Although each method could detect small levels of recovery, the ACOS method was discriminative enough to detect progressive changes up to 5 weeks post-Tx. In conclusion, the ACOS rating scale was the most discriminative method for assessing the spontaneous return of hindlimb movements found in Tx mice, both in open-field and treadmill conditions. © 2007 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ung, R. V., Lapointe, N. P., Tremblay, C., Larouche, A., & Guertin, P. A. (2007). Spontaneous recovery of hindlimb movement in completely spinal cord transected mice: A comparison of assessment methods and conditions. Spinal Cord, 45(5), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101970
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.