The cutoff point of clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire for more symptomatic patients

12Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: An adequate threshold for the Clinical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ) defining more symptomatic COPD patients has not been determined. We aimed to determine the efficacy of the CCQ and the appropriate CCQ threshold for more symptomatic COPD patients. Methods: COPD patients aged >40 years who smoked/had smoked ≥10 packs/year were prospectively enrolled over 1 year from three South Korean hospitals (n=126). Correlations between the CCQ and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the modified Medical Round Council (mMRC) scale, lung function, and exercise capacity were evaluated. "More symptomatic patients" were those with an SGRQ score≥25. Area under the receiver operating curve and classification and regression tree analyses were performed to determine the CCQ threshold equivalent to an SGRQ score≥25. Results: The CCQ significantly correlated with the SGRQ, CAT, and mMRC scale (r=0.76, 0.69, and 0.53, respectively). A CCQ cutoff of 1.4 predicted an SGRQ score of 25 better than others. A CCQ score of 1.4 was a significant determinant of an SGRQ score≥25 even after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions: The CCQ was correlated with other symptom indicators, lung function, and exercise capacity. A CCQ cutoff of 1.4 agreed better than CCQ cutoff of 1.0, suggested by guideline, and this cutoff value may identify more symptomatic COPD patients well.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jo, Y. S., Park, S., Kim, D. K., Yoo, C. G., & Lee, C. H. (2018). The cutoff point of clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire for more symptomatic patients. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0601-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free