Development and growth of the foot lumbricalis muscle: A histological study using human foetuses

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Our group has shown early development of the hand lumbricalis and hypothesized that, at midterm, the lumbricalis (LU) bundles flexor tendons to provide a configuration of “one tendon per one finger” (Cho K.H. Folia Morphol. 2012; 71, 3: 154-163). However, the study concentrated on the hand and contained no sections of near-term foetuses. Materials and methods: The present examination of paraffin-embedded tangential sections along the planta from 25 embryos and foetuses at 6-40 weeks (15-320 mm crown-rump length) demonstrated that, at 8 weeks, the initial foot LU appeared in the proximal side of the common tendinous plate of all five deep tendons. Results: After midterm, a drastic three-phase change occurred at the muscle origin: 1) the LU originated from each of the flexor digitorum longus tendon (FDLT), but abundant tenocyte candidates separated the muscle fibre from the tendon collagen bundle; 2) the LU arose from the covering fascia depending on increased thickness of the muscle; and 3) the LU muscle fibres intermingled with tendon collagen bundles and partly surrounded the tendon. Simultaneously, a dividing site of the FDLT migrated distally to accelerate the changes at the LU origin. These phases did not always correspond to the size of foetus after 30 weeks. Conclusions: Consequently, in contrast to the hand LU, the delayed changes in the foot were characterised by involvement of the LU origin into a single common part of the FDLT. The quadratus plantae muscle fibres did not attach to the LU at any phase, and connected with the fourth and fifth toe tendons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jin, Z. W., Hayashi, S., Cho, K. H., Murakami, G., Wilting, J., & Rodríguez-Vázquez, J. F. (2021). Development and growth of the foot lumbricalis muscle: A histological study using human foetuses. Folia Morphologica (Poland), 80(4), 904–915. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.A2020.0108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free