Efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for patients with esophageal cancer during preoperative therapy

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to clarify the benefits and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) during preoperative therapy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 92 patients who underwent esophagectomy for EC after preoperative therapy. Patients were divided into the PEG group (n=14) and the control group (n=78) and compared regarding patient characteristics, nutritional status, operative variables, and postoperative complications. Results: In the PEG group first nutritional status and tumor stage were significantly worse, but changes of nutritional status from first visit to operation were significantly better. According to the intraoperative thermal imaging, there was no patient with blood flow disturbance in the gastric conduit due to PEG. Short-term surgical outcomes did not significantly differ. Conclusion: PEG has less adverse effects on gastric tube production in esophagectomy and may be considered in highly selective patients during preoperative therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsumoto, A., Yuda, M., Tanaka, Y., Tanishima, Y., Yano, F., Nishikawa, K., … Yanaga, K. (2019). Efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for patients with esophageal cancer during preoperative therapy. Anticancer Research, 39(8), 4243–4248. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13586

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free