Advancing and strengthening the study of social networks in community-level dissemination and implementation research: A narrative review

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The dissemination and implementation (D&I) of evidence at the community level is critical to improve health and advance health equity. Social networks are considered essential to D&I efforts, but there lacks clarity regarding how best to study and leverage networks. We examined networks in community-level D&I frameworks to characterize the range of network actors, activities, and change approaches. We conducted a narrative review of 66 frameworks. Among frameworks that explicitly addressed networks – that is, elaborated on network characteristics, structure, and/or activities – we extracted and synthesized network concepts using descriptive statistics and narrative summaries. A total of 24 (36%) frameworks explicitly addressed networks. Commonly included actors were implementers, adopters/ decision-makers, innovation developers, implementation support professionals, and innovation recipients. Network activities included the exchange of resources, knowledge, trust, and norms. Most network-explicit frameworks characterized ties within and across organizations and considered element(s) of network structure – for example, size, centrality, and density. The most common network change strategy was identifying individuals to champion D&I efforts. We discuss opportunities to expand network inquiry in D&I science, including understanding networks as implementation determinants, leveraging network change approaches as implementation strategies, and exploring network change as an implementation outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Korn, A. R., Cruz, J. L., Smith, N. R., Jacob, R. R., Carney, M., Slater, W., & Ramanadhan, S. (2024, October 28). Advancing and strengthening the study of social networks in community-level dissemination and implementation research: A narrative review. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.614

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free