The Feedback Session of an Autism Assessment: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations

5Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This review aimed to assess the quality and content of recommendations for delivering an autism diagnosis, published internationally within clinical practice guidelines. Seventeen relevant guidelines were identified. When methodological information was provided, recommendations for feedback were predominantly formed through consensus. Recommendations consistently included who should attend feedback, the timing and mode of delivery, the clinician’s manner, and what should be discussed and/or included in an accompanying report. Specific recommendations were not consistent however, and a number of gaps were identified, such as the inclusion of educators and educational specific recommendations. Although individual variation is necessary for autism diagnosis disclosure, agreement on minimum standards of practice is warranted. Further investigation is required to establish best practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pattison, E., Ure, A., Mittiga, S. R., Williams, K., & Freeman, N. C. (2022). The Feedback Session of an Autism Assessment: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(4), 1821–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05067-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free