Beyond the (non)piped drinking water regimes: complex configurations of conflicts and cooperation

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Historically, water utilities have favored the modern ideal of piped infrastructure despite shortcomings in ensuring water access to the urban poor. Consequently, various state and non-state actors play influential roles in shaping water access to the poor through piped and non-piped socio-technical regimes of water provision. However, the existence of piped and non-piped water regimes and how they interact is often not seen as the work of municipalities, and as a result, a plethora of vital water services and actors are still largely ignored in water policy and decision-making. Drawing upon two empirical case studies in Delhi and Nairobi, this article foregrounds the role of conflict and cooperation in the interaction between piped and non-piped water regimes using an analytical framework that builds on Science Technology Studies and Urban Political Ecology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karpouzoglou, T., Vij, S., Narain, V., Juma, B., Sitoki, L., Nilsson, D., & Blomkvist, P. (2025). Beyond the (non)piped drinking water regimes: complex configurations of conflicts and cooperation. Urban Geography, 46(5), 1157–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2025.2464433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free