Validation of the work engagement scale-3, used in the 5th Korean working conditions survey

12Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the 3-item version of the Work Engagement Scale (WES-3), which is based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model and was used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). Methods: This study used data from the 5th KWCS (n = 50,205), which was conducted in 2017 with a sample of the Korean working population. The survey gathered comprehensive information on working conditions to define workforce changes and the quality of work and life. The reliability and internal consistency of the WES-3 were assessed using the corrected item-total correlation and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the construct validity of work engagement. The convergent validity was assessed using the correlation with the WHO-5 well-being index. Correlations between work engagement and JD-R factors were also calculated. Results: The Cronbach's alpha for work engagement was 0.776, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The model comprising 3 work engagement and 2 burnout items showed an excellent fit (χ2: 382.05, Tucker-Lewis index: 0.984, comparative fit index: 0.994, root mean square error of approximation: 0.043). The convergent validity was significant (correlation coefficient: 0.42). Correlations with burnout and job demands were negligible, whereas correlations with job resources and job satisfaction were weakly positive. Conclusions: The results of our study confirm that the WES-3 has acceptable reliability and validity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, M., Suh, C., Choi, S. P., Lee, C. K., & Son, B. C. (2020, July 16). Validation of the work engagement scale-3, used in the 5th Korean working conditions survey. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.35371/AOEM.2020.32.E27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free