Abstract
Background: We aimed to determine the clinicopathological significance of the gross classification of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) guidelines. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 242 cases of consecutively resected solitary primary HCC between 2003 and 2012 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The gross classification (vaguely nodular [VN], expanding nodular [EN], multinodular confluent [MC], nodular with perinodular extension [NP], and infiltrative [INF]) was reviewed for all cases, and were correlated with various clinicopathological features and the expression status of "stemness"-related (cytokeratin 19 [CK19], epithelial cell adhesion molecule [EpCAM]), and epithelial- mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related (urokinase plasminogen activator receptor [uPAR] and Ezrin) markers. Results: Significant differences were seen in overall survival (p =.015) and disease- free survival (p =.034) according to the gross classification; INF type showed the worst prognosis while VN and EN types were more favorable. When the gross types were simplified into two groups, type 2 HCCs (MC/NP/INF) were more frequently larger and poorly differentiated, and showed more frequent microvascular and portal venous invasion, intratumoral fibrous stroma and higher pT stages compared to type 1 HCCs (EN/VN) (p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lee, Y., Park, H., Lee, H., Cho, J. Y., Yoon, Y. S., Choi, Y. R., … Kim, H. (2018). The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of the gross classification of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, 52(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2017.11.13
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.