From house of spirits to carbon sink: Ontological conflicts around REDD+ in the Colombian Amazon

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Based on an ethnographic approach, this article analyzes the ontological conflicts of projects that aim at the Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) in indigenous territories in the Amazon. The analysis is based on a case study in the Selva de Matavén Indigenous reserve in the Colombian Amazon, with a particular focus on the Piaroa people, one of the six groups with ancestral rights to the area. We argue that socio-environmental struggles associated with REDD+ emerge from divergent ontological definitions of what forests and carbon are, their value, and the most appropriate way to protect them. We contribute to critical studies on REDD+ from a political ontology perspective by analyzing how this policy is embedded in particular ways as it enters into friction with place-based processes of carbon entrepreneurship and with people living in forests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gutiérrez-Escobar, L., Hernández Vidal, N., & De la Hoz, N. (2025). From house of spirits to carbon sink: Ontological conflicts around REDD+ in the Colombian Amazon. Human Geography (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786251332581

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free