The minimum significant ratio: A statistical parameter to characterize the reproducibility of potency estimates from concentration-response assays and estimation by replicate-experiment studies

113Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The authors show by illustration that procedures used to validate the reliability of single-concentration high-throughput screens such as the signal window and Z′ factor do not ensure sufficient reliability in potency estimates from concentration response assays. They develop the minimum significant ratio as a statistical parameter to characterize the fold change between 2 compounds run in the same experiment that can be considered a real difference and use this parameter to characterize the reliability of the assay. They adapt methods described by Bland and Altman to develop a simple set of 2 experiments to estimate the minimum significant ratio and show that this protocol can identify assays that lack reproducibility. The methods are then extended to validate the equivalency of the same assay run by multiple laboratories. © 2006 Society for Biomolecular Sciences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eastwood, B. J., Farmen, M. W., Iversen, P. W., Craft, T. J., Smallwood, J. K., Garbison, K. E., … Smith, G. F. (2006). The minimum significant ratio: A statistical parameter to characterize the reproducibility of potency estimates from concentration-response assays and estimation by replicate-experiment studies. Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 11(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057105285611

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free