Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence

99Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sixty-three patients with complete rectal prolapse and/or faecal incontinence have undergone anal manometry and the results have been compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls. Maximal basal pressure (MBP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were measured before and at four months and a year after treatment. The anal pressures of normal subjects are presented. Patients with rectal prolapse alone had normal anal pressures, whereas patients with incontinence with or without prolapse had significantly lower basal and squeeze pressures than controls. Successful surgical treatment of prolapse or incontinence did not produce significant change in anal pressures, whereas the combination of pelvic floor exercises and a continence aid was associated with a significant rise in MSP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matheson, D. M., & Keighley, M. R. B. (1981). Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Gut, 22(2), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.22.2.126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free