Injury patterns in near-hanging patients: How much workup is really needed?

8Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Survivors of near-hangings suffer anoxic brain injuries, but it remains uncertain whether the incidence of associated injuries warrants extensive workup or trauma activation. An 11-year retrospective review was conducted on adult patients with a hanging mechanism who underwent trauma workup and management. The majority of patients (n 5 98) were white (88.8%) males (75.5%) with an average age of 30 6 12.3 years. Two-hundred fifty-four CTand magnetic resonance scans were performed and eight injuries were uncovered: Three thyroid cartilage/hyoid fractures; three vertebral injuries; and two cervical vascular injuries. Anoxic brain injury was diagnosed clinically in 35 patients (35.7%) and was present in all 19 patients (19.4%) who died. Only one patient had intra-abdominal injury requiring surgical intervention. Injuries were more likely in patients with abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) versus normal GCS (55% vs 10.5%, respectively). Patients who present after near-hanging have a low incidence of associated injuries. Workup can be restricted to patients with abnormal GCS scores and for specific signs and symptoms or high-risk energy mechanisms. The trauma team can be activated for signs of trauma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berke, D. M., Helmer, S. D., Reyes, J., & Haan, J. M. (2019). Injury patterns in near-hanging patients: How much workup is really needed? American Surgeon, 85(5), 549–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481908500534

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free