Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conversion to open as a bailout procedure: a cohort study

7Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate morbidity and mortality in patients taken to conversion to open procedure (CO) and subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) as bailout procedures when performing difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: This observational cohort study retrospectively analyzed patients taken to SLC or CO as bailout surgery during difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2022. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for morbimortality. Results: A total of 675 patients were included. Of the 675 patients (mean [SD] age 63.85 ± 16.00 years; 390 [57.7%] male) included in the analysis, 452 (67%) underwent CO and 223 (33%) underwent SLC. Overall, neither procedure had an increased risk of major complications (89 [19.69%] vs 35 [15.69%] P.207). However, CO had an increased risk of bile duct injury (18 [3.98] vs 1 [0.44] P.009), bleeding (mean [SD] 165.43 ± 368.57 vs 43.25 ± 123.42 P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramírez-Giraldo, C., Monroy, D. C., Isaza-Restrepo, A., Ayala, D., González-Tamayo, J., Vargas-Patiño, A. M., … Rojas-López, S. (2024). Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conversion to open as a bailout procedure: a cohort study. Surgical Endoscopy, 38(9), 4965–4975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10911-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free