Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate morbidity and mortality in patients taken to conversion to open procedure (CO) and subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) as bailout procedures when performing difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: This observational cohort study retrospectively analyzed patients taken to SLC or CO as bailout surgery during difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2022. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for morbimortality. Results: A total of 675 patients were included. Of the 675 patients (mean [SD] age 63.85 ± 16.00 years; 390 [57.7%] male) included in the analysis, 452 (67%) underwent CO and 223 (33%) underwent SLC. Overall, neither procedure had an increased risk of major complications (89 [19.69%] vs 35 [15.69%] P.207). However, CO had an increased risk of bile duct injury (18 [3.98] vs 1 [0.44] P.009), bleeding (mean [SD] 165.43 ± 368.57 vs 43.25 ± 123.42 P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ramírez-Giraldo, C., Monroy, D. C., Isaza-Restrepo, A., Ayala, D., González-Tamayo, J., Vargas-Patiño, A. M., … Rojas-López, S. (2024). Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conversion to open as a bailout procedure: a cohort study. Surgical Endoscopy, 38(9), 4965–4975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10911-x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.