Abstract
Aim(s) To examine the evidence of how poorly performing nurses and midwives are managed in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Background Nurses and midwives form the largest clinical group in the NHS. There is little evidencehoweverabout poor performance and its management in nursing and midwifery literature. Method(s) The present study comprised a literature searchanalysis of recent Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) data and observation at NMC fitness to practice hearings. Results Nurses and midwives are the clinical groups most likely to be suspended in the NHS; Trusts do not report data on suspensions therefore no data exist on numbersreasons for suspensionsmanagerial processesgenderarea of workor ethnicity of those suspended; the few major research projects identify variable management practicesthe significant financial cost to the NHS and the personal cost to those suspended; there is evidence that inexperiencedpoorly trainedor poorly supported managers use suspension inappropriately. Our observation supported this. Conclusion(s) There is a need for robust data gathering and research in the field of NHS managerial practice. Implications for nursing management Managers should refrain from adopting punitive forms of performance management. Frontline staff and management need better training and support for dealing with poor performance. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Stone, K., Traynor, M., Gould, D., & Maben, J. (2011). The management of poor performance in nursing and midwifery: A case for concern. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(6), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01219.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.