Leveraging Biotensegrity for Sports Performance: An Ecological Dynamics Perspective

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Traditional sports science methods typically adopt reductionist approaches, focusing on isolated components of performance. Whilst insightful, reductionist approaches often fail to capture the interconnected nature of athletic movements and environmental interactions. In recent decades, two more holistic approaches, ecological dynamics and biotensegrity, have emerged. Ecological dynamics merges nonlinear dynamical systems theory with ecological psychology, delving into the intricate interplay among an athlete’s perceptual experiences, coordination patterns, and the dynamic sporting environment, providing a contemporary framework for exploring goal-directed behaviour and human adaptability. Biotensegrity, rooted in the tensegrity model, offers a holistic view of body posture and movement, emphasising the distribution of forces and signalling through a dynamic, multi scale network of continuous tension and discontinuous compression. By synthesising biotensegrity with ecological dynamics, we can cast new light on elite sports performance, highlighting the pivotal role of perception-action coupling in athlete-environment interactions. Here, we explore the potential value of integrating these two highly compatible perspectives, with the goal of contributing towards the advancement of athletic performance across various sports disciplines. This integrative framework offers a flexible, nuanced, and individualised approach to understanding sports performance, and represents a promising and relatively uncharted territory in sports science, inviting further research and practical applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roy, D., Duhig, S., Lowell de Solorzano, S., & Headrick, J. (2025). Leveraging Biotensegrity for Sports Performance: An Ecological Dynamics Perspective. Ecological Psychology, 37(3), 165–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2024.2448796

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free