The new ACR/EULAR remission criteria: Rationale for developing new criteria for remission

64Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As more effective treatments for RA have become available, studies have demonstrated that in patients who attained remission, defined as a simplified disease activity index (SDAI) =3.3, not only disease activity but radiographic progression was reduced. The feasibility and the benefit of attaining remission led to the development of the ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2011 remission criteria. These criteria employ either a Boolean definition, including tender and swollen joint counts =1, and CRP =1 mg/dl, or an index-based definition, SDAI =3.3, in combination with patient-reported outcomes on a scale of 0-10. It is expected that the ACR/EULAR criteria will be used as secondary outcomes in clinical trials. Some questions about the implementation of the new criteria include the availability of CRP values, and the possibility that patient-reported outcomes may skew the outcome if patients cannot distinguish other musculoskeletal conditions from RA. Several issues require further study, including the role of imaging, fatigue and the impact of the involvement of joints other than the 28 counted in the ACR/EULAR criteria. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bykerk, V. P., & Massarotti, E. M. (2012). The new ACR/EULAR remission criteria: Rationale for developing new criteria for remission. Rheumatology (United Kingdom), 51(SUPPL. 6). https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free