Abstract
The Test of Memory Malingering is one of the most popular and heavily researched validity tests available for use in neuropsychological evaluations. Recent research has suggested, however, that the original indices and cutoffs may require modifications to increase sensitivity rates. Some of these modifications lack cross-validation and no study has examined all indices in a single sample. This study compares Trial 1, Trial 2, the Retention Trial, and the newly created Albany Consistency Index in a criterion group forensic neuropsychological sample. Findings lend support for the newly created indices and cutoff scores. Implications and cautionary statements are provided and discussed. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schroeder, R. W., Buddin, W. H., Hargrave, D. D., VonDran, E. J., Campbell, E. B., Brockman, C. J., … Baade, L. E. (2013). Efficacy of Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Trial 2, the Retention Trial, and the Albany Consistency Index in a criterion group forensic neuropsychological sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs094
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.