Managing organizational paradoxes: a case in the financial industry

0Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to contribute to studies on organizational ambidexterity by analyzing how an incumbent company is managing its innovation structures and balancing exploitation and exploration activities to generate value in a digital economy context. Design/methodology/approach: The research was designed in a qualitative format through a single case study in a Brazilian financial institution, with semi-structured interviews conducted with internal and external players. Findings: Based on the case study, two possible contributions emerged as results, to fill the research gap: the need to develop more complex innovation structures, which act in a way that is integrated to the ecosystem; and the establishment of an organizational function, with a specific mandate to seek innovation in new business platforms. Originality/value: Although the theory gives evidence about the potential that ambidexterity represents for companies, ‘how’ to orchestrate the trade-offs to achieve it is not clear, particularly in regards to first steps toward ambidexterity. This work aims to contribute to fill this gap through an empirical study in a large Brazilian company, analyzing its trajectory toward ambidexterity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

dos Santos, S., & Marx, R. (2021). Managing organizational paradoxes: a case in the financial industry. Revista de Gestao, 28(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-11-2020-0111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free