Melhora da força muscular com suplemento contendo carboidratos duas horas antes de colecistectomia por laparotomia: Estudo randomizado e duplo cego

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: to investigate the effects of preoperative fasting abbreviation with oral supplementation with carbohydrate in the evolution of grip strength in patients undergoing cholecystectomy by laparotomy. Methods: we conducted a clinical, randomizeddouble blind study with adult female patients, aged 18-60 years. Patients were divided into two groups: Control Group, with fasting prescription 6-8h until the time of operation; and Intervention Group, which received prescription of fasting for solids 6-8h before surgery, but ingested an oral supplement containing 12.5% carbohydrate, six (400ml) and two (200ml) hours before theprocedure. The handgrip strength was measured in both hands in both groups, at patient’s admission (6h before surgery), the immediate pre-operative time (1h before surgery) and 12-18h postoperatively. Results: we analyzed 27 patients, 14 in the intervention group and 13 in the control group. There was no mortality. The handgrip strength (mean [standard deviation]) was significantly higher in the intervention group in the three periods studied, in at least one hand: preoperatively in the dominant hand (27.8 [2.6] vs 24.1 [3.7] kg; p=0.04), in the immediate preoperative in both hands, and postoperatively in the non-dominant hand (28.5 [3.0] vs 21.3 [5.9] kg; p=0.01). Conclusion: the abbreviation of preoperative fasting to two hours with drink containing carbohydrate improves muscle function in the perioperative period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gava, M. G., Castro-Barcellos, H. M., Caporossi, C., & de Aguilar-Nascimento, J. E. (2016). Melhora da força muscular com suplemento contendo carboidratos duas horas antes de colecistectomia por laparotomia: Estudo randomizado e duplo cego. Revista Do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 43(1), 054–059. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016001011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free