Physician Selection with a Neutrosophic Multi-criteria Decision Making Method

4Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study, it is done that the evaluation of neurology clinics of two hospitals under the Ministry of Health and their physicians, considering patient preferences. While effective service policies and procedures of hospitals increase customer satisfaction, the performance of physicians ensures preferability. Therefore, measuring satisfaction and performance is crucial for management. However, measurement includes many challenges in connection with many factors and uncertainty on these factors. Thus, neutrosophic multi-criteria decision-making methods have been particularly chosen to overcome these challenges in this study. The related literature on the subject shows that easy access, cleaning and comfort, technological infrastructure, and equipment, total service time, physicians’ communication skills, recognition of physicians, treatment effectiveness, treatment rate, academic career are the main criteria. The values of weights for these criteria and the physicians ranking based on the values of those weights were found by using the Neutrosophic Analytical Hierarchy Process (N-AHP). It has been validated that the ranking is fitting to patient preferences in the Central Physicians Appointment System. As a result, the recommended method can be effectively used in selecting physicians.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarucan, A., Emin Baysal, M., & Engin, O. (2021). Physician Selection with a Neutrosophic Multi-criteria Decision Making Method. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1197 AISC, pp. 319–327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free