ChatGPT and the potential growing of ghost bibliographic references

24Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This letter warns about the identification of research publications available online that contain references to non-existent papers (ghost bibliographic references). This is likely to happen due to the use of ChatGPT, a LLM-based (Large-Language Models) chatbot which generates plausible but fake bibliographic references. Although the magnitude of the problem is still unknown (it could affect only preprint platforms, predatory journals, or poor-quality publication venues) and it is expected that ChatGPT would provide true references in a short period of time, both journals and publishers must be vigilant to prevent fake references from flooding their pages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Orduña-Malea, E., & Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2023, September 1). ChatGPT and the potential growing of ghost bibliographic references. Scientometrics. Akademiai Kiado ZRt. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04804-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free