Effects of pulsed electric fields and ultrasound processing on proteins and enzymes: A review

73Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is increasing demand among consumers for food products free of chemical preserva-tives, minimally processed and have fresh-like natural flavors. To meet these growing demands, the industries and researchers are finding alternative processing methods, which involve nonthermal methods to obtain a quality product that meets the consumer demands and adheres to the food safety protocols. In the past two decades’ various research groups have developed a wide range of nonthermal processing methods, of which few have shown potential in replacing the traditional thermal processing systems. Among all the methods, ultrasonication (US) and pulsed electric field (PEF) seem to be the most effective in attaining desirable food products. Several researchers have shown that these methods significantly affect various major and minor nutritional components present in food, including proteins and enzymes. In this review, we are going to discuss the effect of nonthermal methods on proteins, including enzymes. This review comprises results from the latest studies conducted from all over the world, which would help the research community and industry investigate the future pathway for nonthermal processing methods, especially in preserving the nutritional safety and integrity of the food.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vanga, S. K., Wang, J., Jayaram, S., & Raghavan, V. (2021). Effects of pulsed electric fields and ultrasound processing on proteins and enzymes: A review. Processes. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040722

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free